Book Reviews Subscribe Faith-filled Family Links for Learners Ask a Franciscan Editorial Eye On Entertainment Saints for Our Lives Contents

Why We Need Laci and Conner's Law

It's a picture we've all seen—a smiling Laci Peterson showing off her pregnant belly. Unfortunately, we also know the story that follows: Laci disappeared last Christmas Eve. Her body and that of her unborn son, Conner, were found nearly four months later on the shore of San Francisco Bay. Her husband, Scott, has been charged with two counts of murder.

Another picture tells a similar story, but this story has a somewhat different ending. The picture is of Tracy Marciniak holding her son, Zachariah. The only indication that Zachariah is not sleeping is the tiny coffin in the background.

Tracy was five days from her due date when her husband attacked her on the night of February 8, 1992, punching her in the stomach. Tracy, though injured, survived. Zachariah did not.

To make things worse, Tracy was told at the hospital that her husband could not be tried for murder because, at the time, Wisconsin law did not consider Zachariah a person. (Wisconsin has since implemented a fetal homicide law that recognizes unborn children as victims.)

"There were two victims. He got away with murder," Marciniak said as she recounted her story this past July before a U.S. House Subcommittee on the Constitution. She was there to gain support for the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (UVVA), also referred to as Laci and Conner's Law at the request of Laci's mom, Sharon Rocha.

Taking the Issue to the Federal Level

The UVVA would recognize an unborn child as a legal victim of a crime if he or she is injured or killed during the commission of a federal crime. It would apply only to federal crimes, such as bank robberies or those committed on military bases, in which "a child in utero" is harmed or killed "at any stage of development." The bill does not, however, apply to abortion or the acts of the woman herself.

This is the third time the UVVA has come before Congress. The bill originated in 1999 and was passed by the House that year and in 2001. The Senate didn't take the bill up either time due to strong opposition from groups such as Planned Parenthood Federation of America and NARAL Pro-Choice America. Those organizations argue that the bill is nothing more than a way for pro-life groups to chip away at current pro-abortion laws.

At the time of this writing, the bill is in committee in the House (H.R. 1997), and is on the calendar in the Senate (S. 1019), but no action has been taken. A number of Democratic senators have said they would like to propose amendments to the bill, but have not yet done so.

One of the amendments expected to be proposed is the "single-victim substitute" amendment, which calls for stricter penalties when a crime committed against a pregnant woman results in the loss of her baby, but does not legally recognize the child as a victim.

Cathleen Cleaver, director of planning and information for the U.S. bishops' Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, has repeatedly urged passage of the UVVA. Following the July 8 House hearing, Cleaver said, "When pregnant women and their babies are subject to violence, justice demands recognition of both victims. Anything less is an affront to women and their children."

The National Right to Life Committee, which helped originate the bill, is also pushing for the bill's passage with Marciniak's help. And they feel that they have the will of the American people on their side.

According to a recent poll in Newsweek magazine, conducted by Princeton Research Associates, nearly half of Americans believe human life begins at fertilization. Only 11 percent believe it begins at birth.

President George W. Bush has said he supports the law and would like to see it passed sometime this year.

Just One Piece of the Puzzle

The scope of Laci and Conner's Law is limited. Even Sharon Rocha and Tracy Marciniak acknowledge this, noting that in both cases it would not have applied because they were not federal crimes.

But they are quick to point out that situations like theirs do and will continue to occur within the realm of this law. That prospect alone, they say, should be reason for passage.

And Rep. Melissa Hart (R-Pa.), one  of the bill's chief sponsors, hopes the federal law will encourage states to enact similar bills.

"There's a ripple effect sometimes, and hopefully this legislation will help to get that moving," she said.

At this time, 26 states have laws that recognize unborn children as victims when they are injured or killed during a crime. That means that in the 24 states that don't have such legislation when a pregnant woman's child dies as the result of a violent crime, the mother would be told there was no victim.

Make Your Voice Heard

There are times in life when you must decide whether to stand up and be counted or sit by and do nothing. This is one of those times.

Contact your representatives in Congress and urge them to support this bill. Find out if your state has a fetal homicide law. (A list is posted at www. If your state doesn't have a fetal homicide law, contact your state representatives and let them know you think it should.

Tracy Marciniak was told that her son was not a real victim of a real crime. As a mother of two myself, I don't want another mom to have to hear those words. Do you?   —S.H.B.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ask a Franciscan  | The Bible: Light to My Path  | Book Reviews  | Eye on Entertainment
Editorial  | Editor’s Message  | Faith-filled Family  | Links for Learners
Saints for Our Lives  | Web Catholic  | Back Issues

Return to

Paid Advertisement
Ads contrary to Catholic teachings should be reported to our webmaster. Include ad link.

An Web Site from the Franciscans and
Franciscan Media     ©1996-2016 Copyright